Sunday, July 31, 2011

2012 Honda Pilot – Official Image and Info





A new grille and (probably) transmission are on the menu for one of America’s favorite SUVs.


BY JUSTIN BERKOWITZ, PHOTOGRAPHY BY BRENDA PRIDDY & CO. AND THE MANUFACTURER
July 2011






2012 Honda Pilot






Honda, like airline companies, likes its Pilots to be sober, and there’s nothing to raise a pulse in the 2012 Pilot, which the company has just revealed via a single photo. But for the vast number of Americans—and many of our own staffers—who appreciate the current Pilot and the innocuous, reliable, and easy way it transports up to eight people and their stuff, this is no bad thing.


Up front, the seemingly Battlestar Galactica–inspired fascia seen on the current model is mostly gone, replaced with a rather plain face for 2012. A three-slat grille has been installed, while the lower edge and fog lights are redesigned.


It’s the changes we can’t see—from Honda’s first picture of the new Pilot, at least—that comprise the significant upgrades to the three-row crossover for 2012. Honda promises that the Pilot’s fuel economy will improve, and we expect that this will largely be attributable to a six-speed automatic transmission taking the place of last year’s five-cog unit. We’re also told that the car’s interior has been freshened, with “upgraded” navigation and audio systems. Given that antiquated nav systems and hard-to-navigate radio units have been one of Honda’s most glaring faults in the past several years, we’re glad to hear that some kind of change has been made—although we’ll be eager to try the new setups out for ourselves.


Beyond some new paint colors and a new wheel design, the rest of the 2012 Pilot is about the same as it was in 2011. The automaker says this refreshed model will begin arriving at dealers in September.



 







Honda Adds Sport Model to Refreshed 2012 Ridgeline Lineup



July 25, 2011 at 12:03am by Justin Berkowitz


Along with the Pilot, Honda is face-lifting its un-pickup truck, the Ridgeline, for the 2012 model year. While all models receive a tweaked front fascia—we’re expecting something with three chrome slats, similar to what’s being installed on the Pilot this year—the real news here is the introduction of the Ridgeline Sport, which is shown in the picture above.


Honda has, apparently, sensed that customers who are looking at $30,000 car-based pickups are interested in a bit of sporty flavor, and the Ridgeline Sport is meant to meet that demand. The Ridgeline Sport gets 18-inch aluminum wheels with black paint, a special black honeycomb grille, blacked-out head- and taillights, and black door handles and mirrors. We wouldn’t quite call it sinister based on this picture, but it seems like the Ridgeline Sport might make a better entrance in, say, Los Angeles than would a Dodge Dakota.


As per its usual routine, Honda is tight-lipped about other changes to the Ridgeline lineup, but does promise an improvement from the current car’s EPA fuel-economy rating of 15 mpg city and 20 highway. This may come by way of replacing the Ridgeline’s current five-speed automatic gearbox with a six-speed unit—but the automaker hasn’t said for sure.




Tags: Honda, Honda Ridgeline |



Name That Shifter, No. 34



July 25, 2011 at 11:45am by Car and Driver



Click to enlarge



It’s Monday, and that means it’s time to present this week’s shifter. You’ll have until mid-day Wednesday to identify the make and model of the vehicle from whence this shifter came. The first person to respond correctly in the Backfires section below will win a Save the Manuals magnet and sticker. Good luck!




Tags: Name That Shifter, Save the Manuals! |



Forget an Opel Astra—Hertz Adds Lotus Evoras to Its European Fleets



July 25, 2011 at 12:01pm by Alexander Stoklosa


Hertz has announced that it is adding the Lotus Evora to the Adrenaline Range of its Fun Collection in Germany, Spain, and the U.K. The Evora will also join Hertz’s Fun Collection in France as a “special car.” Rental cars rarely evoke romantic motoring imagery— the “rental-grade” descriptor is a barb reserved for the crummiest of new cars—but Hertz has a long history of attempting to inject some fun into its temporary rides, starting with its Shelby GT-H rent-a-racecar program in the ‘60s. Fun history aside, the availability of an Evora for hire is still something of a pleasant surprise given the car’s semi-exotic nature.


The Evora isn’t the first Lotus to grace a Hertz lot; a few years ago the company added a bevy of Elise SCs dolled up in Hertz yellow paint and sporting Hertz-embossed seats to its fleet in Italy. The Evora’s 2+2 seating and greater cargo capacity certainly makes more sense for travelers than the two-seater Elise SC (which may have been able to swallow a plane ticket and its sleeve—but only for one passenger). Furthermore, Hertz feels the “style, elegance, agility, and sportiness” of the Evora will “make driving journeys a dream come true.” If you’re waiting for the pinch that will wake you up, here it is: rates for the mid-engine Evora start at €250 ($359.50!) per day.




Tags: Hertz, Lotus, Lotus Evora |



Saturday, July 30, 2011

NASCAR: Nationwide and Truck Series in action this weekend:

AutoWeek loves passionate comments and debate, but remember that you're part of a diverse community. Above all: be respectful. Critique statements, not people; talk about the automotive world, but skip the political rhetoric, hate speech, and obscenities. While we can't read every post, this site is moderated and AutoWeek will remove comments as we see fit. Questions? Read our Terms of Use or email moderator@autoweek.com.

Formula One: Webber leads Alonso in German Grand Prix afternoon practice:







Webber LAT PHOTOGRAPHIC
Mark Webber paced Friday afternoon Formula One practice.

By ADAM COOPER on 7/22/2011



Red Bull Racing and Ferrari on Friday shared the honors during the first day of practice for Sunday's German Grand Prix, as Ferrari showed that its British Grand Prix win two weeks ago was no fluke. Fernando Alonso led Mark Webber in the morning session, and then the Aussie led the Spaniard in the afternoon, though only by 0.168 second.


Meanwhile, in both sessions, Sebastian Vettel was a close third, and Felipe Massa was a slightly more distant fourth, indicating that this race weekend is likely to be all about the two teams.


Significantly, Ferrari is quick at the Nürburgring GP circuit despite the return of exhaust-blown diffusers, after the one-off clampdown on the technology for the British GP.


Although the skies on Friday were gray, no rain fell, but it is virtually guaranteed to come down at some point during the weekend.


“It was good fun. Obviously, the circuit was quite slippery, the temperatures being low,” Vettel said, enjoying his first home race as reigning world champion. “All in all, I think we did a lot of laps, and the cars seem to be OK. We're not 100 percent happy yet. We'll see what happens tomorrow [in qualifying]. At this stage, [there is] obviously a lot of work ahead. Ferrari looks very competitive; McLaren is a bit more difficult to judge, so we'll see.


“I think if we can make a step forward, then it's worth a lot. We don't know the conditions for tomorrow and Sunday. Rain is forecasted, so it's on the way. It's a question of where and when it will hit us. Now we need to sit down and see what we can improve, but surely I think there is room to improve.”


In the afternoon's faster session, Michael Schumacher gave his German fans something to cheer with fifth place, ahead of teammate Nico Rosberg.


Lewis Hamilton was only seventh for McLaren, complaining that a lack of downforce was simply costing the silver cars speed in the corners--and it's not something that can be resolved overnight. Jenson Button, who had an exhaust failure and missed gaining some useful mileage, was only 11th.


With blown diffusers back in action, the Renaults looked good in eighth and ninth, with Nick Heidfeld ahead of Vitaly Petrov. The former was trying a new rearward-facing exhaust layout, instead of the usual side exit. Adrian Sutil rounded out the top 10 for Force India.


Karun Chandhok is having his first full race weekend for Team Lotus and was 20th in the afternoon session. His countryman Narain Karthikeyan returned after missing Silverstone, but only as a test driver in the first session before handing the HRT car to Tonio Liuzzi.


Practice Times


1. Mark Webber, Red Bull Racing-Renault, 1 minute 31.711 seconds, 34 laps


2. Fernando Alonso, Ferrari, 1:31.879, +0.168, 38


3. Sebastian Vettel, Red Bull Racing-Renault, 1:32.084, +0.373, 28


4. Felipe Massa, Ferrari, 1:32.354, +0.643, 36


5. Michael Schumacher, Mercedes GP, 1:32.411, +0.700, 31


6. Nico Rosberg, Mercedes GP, 1:32.557, +0.846, 32


7. Lewis Hamilton, McLaren-Mercedes, 1:32.724, +1.013, 28


8. Nick Heidfeld, Renault, 1:33.098, +1.387, 17


9. Vitaly Petrov, Renault, 1:33.138, +1.427, 22


10. Adrian Sutil, Force India-Mercedes, 1:33.211, +1.500, 34


11. Jenson Button, McLaren-Mercedes, 1:33.225, +1.514, 17


12. Paul Di Resta, Force India-Mercedes, 1:33.299, +1.588, 34


13. Sergio Pérez, Sauber-Ferrari, 1:34.113, +2.402, 34


14. Rubens Barrichello, Williams-Cosworth, 1:34.344, +2.633, 34


15. Jaime Alguersuari, Scuderia Toro Rosso-Ferrari, 1:34.487, +2.776, 37


16. Kamui Kobayashi, Sauber-Ferrari, 1:34.491, +2.780, 35


17. Pastor Maldonado, Williams-Cosworth, 1:34.996, +3.285, 35


18. Heikki Kovalainen, Lotus-Renault, 1:35.753, +4.042, 42


19. Timo Glock, Virgin-Cosworth 1:36.940, +5.229, 32


20. Karun Chandhok, Lotus-Renault, 1:37.248, +5.537, 33


21. Jerome d'Ambrosio, Virgin-Cosworth, 1:37.313, +5.602, 33


22. Vitantonio Liuzzi, HRT-Cosworth, 1:38.145, +6.434, 31


23. Daniel Ricciardo, HRT-Cosworth, 1:40.737, +9.026, 5


24. Sébastien Buemi, Scuderia Toro Rosso-Ferrari, no time, 3


 





AutoWeek loves passionate comments and debate, but remember that you're part of a diverse community. Above all: be respectful. Critique statements, not people; talk about the automotive world, but skip the political rhetoric, hate speech, and obscenities. While we can't read every post, this site is moderated and AutoWeek will remove comments as we see fit. Questions? Read our Terms of Use or email moderator@autoweek.com.






Wild Ride: Jenson Button drives McLaren F1 car around Moscow\'s streets:

AutoWeek loves passionate comments and debate, but remember that you're part of a diverse community. Above all: be respectful. Critique statements, not people; talk about the automotive world, but skip the political rhetoric, hate speech, and obscenities. While we can't read every post, this site is moderated and AutoWeek will remove comments as we see fit. Questions? Read our Terms of Use or email moderator@autoweek.com.

Formula One: Ecclestone admits making payment to criminally charged banker:







Bernie Ecclestone LAT PHOTOGRAPHIC
Bernie Ecclestone admitted to making a payment to a criminally charged banker

By QUENTIN SPURRING on 7/22/2011



Formula One boss Bernie Ecclestone is defending his reputation after his name was mentioned in charges filed by the Munich state prosecutor in Germany against Gerhard Gribkowsky, a former chief risk officer of the state-owned Bayerische Landesbank, in connection with the sale of F1 five years ago.


Bayerische Landesbank (known as BayernLB) and two other banks, JP Morgan and Lehman Brothers, had acquired 75 percent of SLEC, the parent company of the F1 group, in 2002. The acquisition followed the collapse of Kirch, a German company that had used its F1 holding as collateral for loans totaling $1.6 billion. The remaining 25 percent was held by Bambino, an Ecclestone family offshore trust.


In 2006, the three banks and Bambino sold their shares to the CVC Capital Partners private equity firm, which still owns F1.


Gribkowsky was responsible for the sale of BayernLB's 47 percent stake. He has been in jail since January, when he was arrested in connection with that transaction. The office of the Staatsanwaltschaft München has now formally charged him with breach of trust, tax evasion and receiving “corrupt payments” from Ecclestone and Bambino totaling $44 million. The prosecutors added that Ecclestone remains “under investigation” for alleged bribery and abetting breach of trust.


For his part, Ecclestone has now admitted making the payments but continues to deny any wrongdoing.


Ecclestone stopped short of accusing Gribkowsky of outright blackmail, but he told London's Daily Telegraph newspaper that Gribkowsky made false allegations about Ecclestone's relationship with Bambino and implied that he could cause trouble for the F1 ringmaster with the United Kingdom's Revenue and Customs service.


“I have never had anything to do with the trust in any shape or form, [but Gribkowsky] threatened that he was going to say that I was running it,” Ecclestone claimed.


Ecclestone said he transferred his own shares in F1 to the trust because he was concerned that if he died, Slavica Ecclestone (his wife at the time) would have to pay inheritance tax because she had not lived in the United Kingdom long enough to be domiciled.


“The Revenue [office] obviously had to check everything,” he said. “They took five years going through that, and at the time [of the BayernLB transaction], they were in the middle of settling everything with the trust. The last thing you need is for them to start thinking something different. Nothing was wrong with the trust, nothing at all. [But Gribkowsky] was shaking me down, and I didn't want to take a risk.”


Ecclestone emphasized that Gribkowsky asked to borrow the money.


“He never said to me, ‘If you don't give me this, I will say that,'” he clarified.


Ecclestone stated that he asked his lawyers what would happen if Gribkowsky went to the Revenue office with his allegations.


“They said, ‘The Revenue would assess you, and you would have to defend it. You would be three years in court, and it would cost you a fortune. Better pay.'”


Ecclestone said that he then made the payments through offshore companies based in the British Virgin Islands and Mauritius. He explained that Gribkowsky “wanted to be paid so it didn't look like it came from me and didn't look like it came from England.”


Prosecutors stated that Gribkowsky set up and controlled two Austrian companies that recorded receipt of the money from sources named as “Bambino Trust” and “Bernard E.” They added, “According to the results of [our] investigations, this was bribery money, whose payment was disguised through two fake consulting contracts with [the companies] in Mauritius and the British Virgin Islands.”


The prosecutors further allege that in return, Gribkowsky committed BayernLB to paying $41.4 million to Ecclestone and $25 million to Bambino. Their statement continued, “These payments would not have been asked for were it not for the bribes to be paid to [Gribkowsky]. BayernLB incurred damages of almost $66.5 million through the conduct of the accused.”


However, Ecclestone also claims that the money he received at the deal's conclusion was bona fide commission.


“I never bribed anybody or paid any money to anybody in connection with the company,” he told the Daily Telegraph. I got 5 percent [commission] for the sale of the company. BayernLB approved the sale and approved the commission, which was cheap. There were no secrets.”


In a reference to an interview in April with public prosecutor Hildegard Baumler-Hosl, Ecclestone concluded by saying that he had already given all of these details to the prosecutors in person and that he expected to be cleared of any wrongdoing.


 





AutoWeek loves passionate comments and debate, but remember that you're part of a diverse community. Above all: be respectful. Critique statements, not people; talk about the automotive world, but skip the political rhetoric, hate speech, and obscenities. While we can't read every post, this site is moderated and AutoWeek will remove comments as we see fit. Questions? Read our Terms of Use or email moderator@autoweek.com.






Formula One: Friday\'s FIA transcript for the German Grand Prix:







Formula One Motorsports McLaren LAT PHOTOGRAPHIC
Jenson Button laps around the Nurburgring Circuit during Friday practice.

Published on 7/22/2011



Here is Friday's FIA press conference transcript from the German Grand Prix with team representatives James Allison (Renault), Stefano Domenicali (Ferrari), Mark Gallagher (Cosworth), Norbert Haug (Mercedes) and Monisha Kaltenborn (Sauber).


Q: Mark, how much of a loss has the Williams team been and apparently you are confident of replacing them with another manufacturer?


Mark Gallagher: Yeah, it has been an interesting few weeks as the decision Williams has taken to go with Renault starting next season is, from a human point of view inside Cosworth, disappointing. From a business point of view it doesn't change anything for us because we had always planned our comeback into Formula One as an engine supplier based around supplying new teams with engines. It was actually very fortuitous that a team as famous and successful as Williams came along and asked us for an engine supply. Disappointing on a human level, on a business level we understand the decision and we are just looking to the future now. We have got two new teams that have recently announced big changes. The Marussia Virgin Racing deal with McLaren Applied Technologies is a very interesting one, particularly for us to work with McLaren and Marussia Virgin from next season. Then with the recent changes at Hispania Racing in terms of investment in the team, fresh investment, I think everyone can see HRT has made some good steps this season. Business continues. I think we have been quoted as saying and quite rightly that since 1963 Cosworth has supplied 67 different teams with engines. Actually 10 of the teams on the grid today in some form or other have used our engines in Formula One so I am confident that we will have many good days ahead. The quest for us really is to secure long-term contracts, certainly beyond the V8 era, and with the exciting news of the arrival of the V6 engines for 2014, that's more of a focus for us at the moment so onwards and upwards.


Q: And the teams want you as well. The teams' organization wants to keep you as well.


MG: Yeah, I have to say that although Formula One can often be portrayed as being highly political and there is no doubt that politics does play a part in the sport, Cosworth's experience over the last couple of years has been a very positive one. Working indeed with our competitors in terms of the engine working group technically and the work that I am currently involved in with our competitors on the resource restriction agreement covering the V6 engines which is coming along. There is actually really a good sense of everyone working together to try and secure the long-term stability of Formula One, technically and commercially, and of course that is important for us all. You are quite right, we have had some very positive statements made to us by even our competitors as well as teams that comprise FOTA and we are very confident for the future. We are a company with huge experience and a significant capability technically and an impressive track record and we believe that will stand the test of time.


Q: I guess the V6 regulations mean a fresh start for you as well, but obviously a huge investment?


MG: It is a significant investment but maybe in the mists of time people have overlooked the fact that the current engine, the CA, which started life in 2006 was created by Cosworth as an independent company in the post-Ford era. We have invested significant sums in the past on new Formula One engines and we will invest again for the future. The question has never been can Cosworth invest in new engines or do we have the capability to invest in new engines. The question has been does the sport want new engines and do the customer teams want to pay for the new technologies that are coming through and how is that going to be structured? We have got, I think, great clarity now and for us the V6 engine has got a lot of people in Northampton smiling because we have very talented people who quite frankly live for the day when they can get out of bed and design new racing engines and particularly when we are taking on some of the giants of the sport. It is part of the tradition of Cosworth and long may it continue.


Q: Monisha, both your drivers set personal records, one for qualifying and the other for their race performance at the last race, so you must be very pleased with that and also the very fact that you are competitive at this stage of the season?


Monisha Kaltenborn: Yes, we are quite pleased actually with this season. At the beginning of the season we set the target that we wanted to have a reliable car and fast car and regularly score points. If you look at the performance so far we have managed, with one exception until now, to at least finish the race in ranks where you can score points. We didn't quite manage that on the first race so we are very happy with our performance. We are happy with our drivers. Where we do see room to improve is on our efficiency because we could have scored more points looking at our performance so we have to work on that still.


Q: How important is it to be competitive at this stage of the season where we have got a double header plus then the summer break, plus then another grand prix?


MK: This season is extremely important because there has been so much development going on during the season so you really have to keep it up at each and every race event to stay within your group and catch up on the ones in front of you and I think it is especially very important in this particular season with what's been going on.


Q: You are in a battle really with Scuderia Toro Rosso and Force India, the three of you?


MK: It is the three of us and the gaps are not that big and it doesn't take much and you can find yourself in a very different position after two or three races. You really have to keep this momentum going of your development.


Q: So those are the aims are they at the moment, to get ahead of those two?


MK: The aim is clearly to improve our position significantly from last year and we will see where we end up.


Q: James, how much has it meant upgrading the wind tunnel from 50 to 60 percent?


James Allison: Well it is a lot of work, that's for sure. People call wind-tunnel models ‘models' but they are not really models at all. They are things that cost almost as much as making a real car and almost as complicated. Just changing the model from 50 percent to 60 percent is already a large engineering exercise but in our case as well the wind tunnel working sections wasn't really quite big enough to support a 60 percent model so we needed to strip that back to its bare skeleton and replace it with something that was man enough for a 60 percent model, so all told it was a project that started around about a year ago and culminated just recently.


Q: How much time do you think you lost and is it now back on track totally?


JA: Well very little actual wind tunnel time, as one of the most precious things to all teams is to keep that tunnel running and to keep the aero development going so we made sure we could do the swap-over with the minimum amount of disruption to the actual tunnel testing. We had the tunnel down for 12 days.


Q: You are now FOTA's technical mastermind. What sort of responsibility is that?


JA: Well it is a significant responsibility. I think everyone would agree that FOTA is a group that has acted strongly in the interests of the sport and very constructively and the technical regulation working group is one part of what FOTA does. It's a part which tries to look constructively in the medium and long term to contribute to making the rules of the sport work well, working hand in hand with the FIA to do that, and hopefully I can pick up where some of my predecessors have left off in looking after those meetings in an efficient way.


Q: You said before this race you would let the cars do the talking when it came to the modifications you have got on the cars. What did they say today?


JA: Well we have had a reasonable day today. What I meant by letting the cars do the talking is that we have got a number of improvements to bring over the next several races that we hope will restore us to something closer to where we were at the start of the year than we have been in the last two or three races. It is very easy to talk about ‘you've got this and you've got that' but it will be much nicer when we have actually put it on the track and everyone can see it so hopefully that's what will happen.


Q: Stefano, the Silverstone result was excellent but it was said to be a circuit that didn't necessarily suit the car. Does this circuit suit the car better, Hungary even better perhaps?


Stefano Domenicali: We are discovering day by day what is going on in internal development and what I can confirm is that we have done a significant step in terms of performance and this is the positive thing at the moment what we can say. I agree with James and let the car speak. This is what we need to see here tomorrow, above all on Sunday and in Hungary. It is a good reward for the team because that result came after a couple of races where we could have achieved more in terms of result but that's it. It is something that we need to put back and make sure it wasn't just one race. This should be the target for every time. We know that the competition is very tight and difficult so let's be very concentrated here this weekend as it will not be easy at all.


Q: Also there is the double header with Hungary coming up and then the break as well?


SD: Yeah, it would be nice to have a good result before the break mainly for the spirit and for the classification but we have learned this year that every weekend is different from the other. The only thing we can do is to make sure that the drivers and the team is fully concentrated on the job. Today we had quite a massive program to do some comparison, a couple of checks on the car, and we need to make sure that we take the right decision for qualifying tomorrow. I am guessing that the weather will be quite tricky so that's the objective of today.


Q: The president (of Ferrari, Luca di Montezemolo) has suggested that Felipe Massa will be staying with the team next year; can that be confirmed?


SD: Have you seen anyone below the president not confirm what the president is saying? At least not in my company; maybe Norbert you can say something later, but apart from that, Felipe had an agreement with us up to the end of next year, so yes, I can tell you.


Norbert Haug: One time, I suppose, just one time.


Q: Norbert, everyone in your team was very upbeat coming here but the cars didn't look very comfortable this morning. Maybe it was better this afternoon?


NH: Well, I wouldn't say upbeat. We had a difficult start at Silverstone and recovered quite well. I think we were 12th and 16th, 17th after lap one or after lap two and then came home sixth and ninth, so at least this was a good recovery, but, of course, we are still not there, to fight with the top three teams. Renault is quite strong, close behind us. We need to establish a better pace. We are working very hard, we are committed and we are working through our program. That's what we did today. I don't think it was too bad this afternoon. We produced consistent lap times in the race simulation and of course we know that we cannot beat the top three teams, so probably our aim has to be sixth, seventh, eighth, something like that, in qualifying. The race will probably be under rainy conditions – that, at least, is what the forecast says today – having said that, it was not precise for today, so this may change – and this is what we can do. We need to build on what we have, step by step.


Q: Tell us of the importance of this race at the historic Nürburgring, as your home race, particularly for the new Mercedes GP Petronas team.


NH: No doubt this is not quite as Monza is for Ferrari but it is our home race, it is our second home race after Silverstone because the team is based in England, obviously. The Silver Arrows were born here 77 years ago, as you know, so this is a big tradition and we need to fulfill it, we know that but we cannot win on our own means at the moment, we know that, but I think the good thing is that Mercedes is present in Formula One and who knows… Mercedes knows that they are going to get the job done, we are going to get the job done but we are still a young team, a learning team, but we dare to be there, we dare to have the competition, we like to fight with the guys. We're not good enough, at the moment, but we have won in the past, we won six World Championships with our partners, seventy-five races out of 250 so far, so this is not such a bad score and now we are building up something new and I am very grateful that our board gave us the support and gave us the opportunity. It makes sense commercially, we are very good in that respect. We are not good enough in the points standings at the moment but believe me, we are working on it.


Q: I know it's only Friday but it's interesting to see your two customer teams, your two partners, McLaren and Force India very much on similar performance today.


NH: I wouldn't rate that too highly. I think McLaren-Mercedes has to be better. This was the case in the last couple of races. We started ahead of Lewis in the last race. He was on used tires in qualifying, Nico was on used tires but they are quicker, they belong to the top three. They have won two races already, could have won more by the way. They could have won four. It was very close in Barcelona and in Monaco. Stefano could have won in Monaco as well, from the sheer speed but they are just better at the moment but not forever, that's for sure.


 





AutoWeek loves passionate comments and debate, but remember that you're part of a diverse community. Above all: be respectful. Critique statements, not people; talk about the automotive world, but skip the political rhetoric, hate speech, and obscenities. While we can't read every post, this site is moderated and AutoWeek will remove comments as we see fit. Questions? Read our Terms of Use or email moderator@autoweek.com.






Reviewing the past but looking to the future:







Will Power LAT PHOTOGRAPHIC
Will Power checks in with his latest AutoWeek column.

By WILL POWER on 7/22/2011



It's good to be back for another installment of my AutoWeek column. I've definitely calmed down after what happened to us in Toronto, and although I am still not happy with what happened on the track, we need to move forward.


Before we talk about our next race in Edmonton this weekend, if you saw the Toronto event, you know what happened. If you didn't, the long and short of it was that there were lots of unnecessary crashes--including my championship rival, Dario Franchitti, spinning me at turn three. Then Alex Tagliani hit me from behind not long afterward and ended my race entirely.


Verizon Team Penske has had a few other challenges lately, too. We qualified only 17th in Milwaukee because the car was little bit too loose in qualifying, but we ended up having a good race. To finish in fourth was pretty good considering where we started, so I was relatively happy with that.


But Milwaukee affected us somewhat at the subsequent race, in Iowa, because IndyCar's system for deciding pit-box position is based on qualifying at the most recent race on a similar type of track--in this case, an oval. So we were the 17th team to choose a pit, which put us pretty far down the line in pit lane.


We aren't really used to being in that position, and when we finished our first pit stop during the race in Iowa, we took off the way we normally would as if we were at the front of the pit lane. But we weren't really looking down the road as we should have been, and Charlie Kimball was coming into his pit, and we made contact. That was the beginning of a bad race right there, and then I lost the car and hit the wall to finish the job.


I'll tell you, the crash was exactly what it looked like--it was a hard hit. It wasn't dead square-on, which made it a bit better. Still, it was obviously a big impact. You just don't go into the wall softly there because of the corner speed and the angle. With that type of corner, the angle there is always pretty sharp, and it's probably one of the worst places you can crash. But it didn't really affect me for Toronto at all. I felt I was completely back to normal by then.


I was asked how difficult it is to put a crash like that out of your mind, and the thing that helped me in this case was that I knew why it happened. The car was bent from the impact earlier with Kimball. The steering was out of whack, and we bent the front suspension, so the car wasn't right.


Driving a damaged race car in that situation is my decision and no one else's. It's on me and has nothing to do with the team sending me out there in a wounded car. So that was just me wanting to keep going because of the championship fight. You think, maybe if we hang around the back of the field, we can get some points or move up if someone makes a mistake.


In retrospect, it was probably the wrong call at Iowa. The problem was, I had to put so much steering lock into the car to make it go around the corners that if I had a tricky moment like I had, there was no way of catching it because my hand was so far around already.


We've had two DNFs in a row, but we're going to Edmonton looking to have a good, solid race weekend. I know some people might think we've lost momentum recently, especially since Franchitti leads us by 55 points now, but I don't think that's true. It just gets harder and harder to win in IndyCar, because the drivers and teams seem to get tougher and quicker every weekend. We just have to run strong in Edmonton and not even think about the points; they are what they are. We need to get on the track and set ourselves on a positive path and have a mistake-free weekend. That's what it takes to win in this series.


You might have noticed that Verizon Team Penske made a change to my crew recently by bringing team president Tim Cindric on my car as the race strategist after Tim has worked with Helio Castroneves for years. We've had a couple of issues in the pits, and even though it's never the same problem, I think Tim is just coming over to my crew to get his take on the situation and maybe to calm the seas a bit. Tim is very good on the radio and very good with race strategy. He's also good with the crew guys all around as far as being a strong leader. It's an easy transition for me, and I look forward to working with him for the rest of the year.


Of course, Edmonton is another tough street race, so there is potential for more of the kind of action we saw in Toronto. There's nothing I can do about that except drive the best race I can and at least try to stay out of other people's problems. I have said all I have to say about the incident with Dario. I did not agree with how he raced me, and we obviously have different views of what happened.


My focus now is on getting the best result possible at Edmonton for Verizon Team Penske and taking some positive steps forward in the championship race.


Follow us all season long here on autoweekracing.com and on Twitter @12WillPower.


Editor's note: AutoWeekEditor at speed Will Power drives the No. 12 Verizon Team Penske car in the Izod IndyCar Series. Last season, Power led the series with five wins and a single-season-record eight pole positions. He earned the inaugural Mario Andretti Road Course Championship and finished second in the overall series title chase.


After experiencing success in his native Australia and Europe as his career blossomed, Power first came to the United States to race in 2005. He was the Champ Car World Series rookie of the year in 2006, competing for Team Australia. He finished fourth in the Champ Car championship the following season, with two wins and eight top-five finishes. Power won at Long Beach in 2008 in Champ Car's last event and then completed his first full season in the Izod IndyCar Series for KV Racing Technology. Power joined Team Penske in 2009, filling in for Helio Castroneves during his tax-evasion trial, and he earned five more starts after Castroneves returned to the team. Just a few weeks after posting his first win for Team Penske, Power suffered injuries in a horrific accident in practice at Infineon Raceway in Sonoma, Calif., to end his season early. He made a triumphant return to action in 2010.


 





AutoWeek loves passionate comments and debate, but remember that you're part of a diverse community. Above all: be respectful. Critique statements, not people; talk about the automotive world, but skip the political rhetoric, hate speech, and obscenities. While we can't read every post, this site is moderated and AutoWeek will remove comments as we see fit. Questions? Read our Terms of Use or email moderator@autoweek.com.






Grand-Am: New Daytona Prototypes to debut in 2012 Rolex 24 at Daytona :

AutoWeek loves passionate comments and debate, but remember that you're part of a diverse community. Above all: be respectful. Critique statements, not people; talk about the automotive world, but skip the political rhetoric, hate speech, and obscenities. While we can't read every post, this site is moderated and AutoWeek will remove comments as we see fit. Questions? Read our Terms of Use or email moderator@autoweek.com.

Friday, July 29, 2011

Formula One: News Corp. still silent about takeover bid:

AutoWeek loves passionate comments and debate, but remember that you're part of a diverse community. Above all: be respectful. Critique statements, not people; talk about the automotive world, but skip the political rhetoric, hate speech, and obscenities. While we can't read every post, this site is moderated and AutoWeek will remove comments as we see fit. Questions? Read our Terms of Use or email moderator@autoweek.com.

IndyCar: Rain forces cancellation of Friday practice in Edmonton:

AutoWeek loves passionate comments and debate, but remember that you're part of a diverse community. Above all: be respectful. Critique statements, not people; talk about the automotive world, but skip the political rhetoric, hate speech, and obscenities. While we can't read every post, this site is moderated and AutoWeek will remove comments as we see fit. Questions? Read our Terms of Use or email moderator@autoweek.com.

NASCAR: Austin Dillon captures Truck Series win in Nashville:







NASCAR truck series Nashville Austin Dillon. LAT PHOTOGRAPHIC
Austin Dillon started Friday night's Camping World Truck Series race on the pole and finished with a win.

By AL PEARCE on 7/22/2011



Pole-sitter Austin Dillon took the lead from Johnny Sauter with 23 laps remaining Friday night and drove away to easily win the Lucas Deep Clean Camping World Truck Series 200 at Nashville Speedway. It was Dillon’s third career Truck Series win (his first this year), all of them from the pole.


Dillon, grandson of six-time Sprint Cup championship owner Richard Childress, led the first 29 of the 150 laps around the 1.333-mile track. Timothy Peters came forward and dominated the middle portion of the race, leading twice for 67 of 73 laps at one point. But Sauter and Dillon restarted ahead of Peters after the next-to-last caution at lap 103, and both drove away from the rest of the field. Dillon led laps 104-106, Sauter led 107-127, then Dillon led the final 23.


Sauter finished a distant second, then Peters, ex-Formula One driver Nelson Piquet Jr., Parker Kligerman, Todd Bodine, James Buescher, David Starr, Elliott Sadler, and second-faster qualifier Joey Coulter. All told, Peters led twice for 67 laps, Dillon four times for 56, Sauter once for 21, Coulter once for four and Cole Whitt once for two laps.


TOP 10 FINISHERS


1. Austin Dillon, Chevrolet


2. Johnny Sauter, Chevrolet


3. Timothy Peters, Toyota


4. Nelson Piquet Jr., Chevrolet


5. Parker Kligerman, Dodge


6. Todd Bodine, Toyota


7. James Buescher, Chevrolet


8. David Starr, Toyota


9. Elliott Sadler, Chevrolet


10. Joey Coulter, Chevrolet


POINTS LEADERS


1. Johnny Sauter, 431


2. Austin Dillon, -18


3. James Buescher, -42


4. Cole Whitt, -43


5. Timothy Peters, -47


6. Matt Crafton, -54


7. Parker Kligerman, -58


8. Joey Coulter, -65


9. Ron Hornaday Jr., -69


10. Todd Bodine, -81


Next event: July 29, Clermont, Ind.


 





AutoWeek loves passionate comments and debate, but remember that you're part of a diverse community. Above all: be respectful. Critique statements, not people; talk about the automotive world, but skip the political rhetoric, hate speech, and obscenities. While we can't read every post, this site is moderated and AutoWeek will remove comments as we see fit. Questions? Read our Terms of Use or email moderator@autoweek.com.






Name That Exhaust Note, Episode 97: 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT8



July 22, 2011 at 5:00pm by Car and Driver

Name That Exhaust Note Episode 97



On Tuesday, we posted an audio recording of a mystery car’s exhaust note, but a technical hiccup meant that it was one we’d already posted. So we posted another one on Wednesday, and extended this week’s deadline until today, and then it was business as usual. Our winner in this week’s special DiRT3 video game giveaway is KindOfABigDeal, who identified the sound as coming from a 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT8. To hear (the correct and original) exhaust note again, click play above.


Like that sound? Download the MP3 and quiz your friends, make your own ringtone, or just lull yourself to sleep with sweet, sweet vehicular ear candy.


2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT8 MP3 (Right-click to Save As…)




Tags: Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT8, Name That Exhaust Note |



Thursday, July 28, 2011

2013 Infiniti JX Crossover Preview Parade, Float Number Three



July 22, 2011 at 5:20pm by Steve Siler


We’re now in week three of the seven-week, seven-picture preview parade Infiniti has undertaken for its JX crossover SUV. In this third detail shot, we can see the JX’s take on the kinked D-pillar that Infiniti promises will be a hallmark of its styling moving forward, as well as the rearmost glass panel of what is likely a full-length panoramic roof. We can also see that the metallic roof rail cleverly conceals the liftgate hinge at its rearmost edge, and that the lower portion of the doors will incorporate a light-catching crease. Also, based on this and the last two shots, we also are left to surmise that Infiniti’s favorite color for its new crossover is a mossy green. Click here to see the first shot and here to see the second, and check back with us next week for the next preview shot.




Tags: Infiniti, Infiniti JX |



2012 Audi A6 Hybrid Full Specs Released; U.S. Availability Not Yet Determined



July 22, 2011 at 5:50pm by Alexander Stoklosa


Audi’s new 2012 A6 debuted at this year’s Detroit auto show, and Audi stated at the time that a hybrid version was in the works; the company didn’t promise, however, that it would come to the U.S. Fast-forward to today, and full specs on the A6 hybrid have been fully revealed; we still don’t know if we’ll get it. One clue existed in the press materials, though: Audi converted its fuel-economy numbers for the green-leaning four-door to U.S. mpg, and it nets an impressive 37 mpg combined.



The Audi A6 hybrid combines a 211-hp, 2.0-liter turbo four-cylinder engine with a 54-hp (40-kW) electric motor, and routes a total system output of 245 hp to the front wheels through an eight-speed automatic transmission. The hybrid powertrain’s peak torque output of 354 lb-ft is healthy, and it helps scoot the A6 hybrid to 60 mph in a claimed 7.3 seconds. Juiced by a lithium-ion battery pack mounted beneath the trunk floor, the electric motor can accelerate the A6 to 62 mph or travel up to 1.9 miles at less than 40 mph on its own. (So, realistically, to your mailbox and back.) The A6 hybrid comes equipped with three driver-selectable operating modes: electricity-prioritizing “EV,” normal “D,” and sporty “S.” It should be noted that it’s only in S mode that the A6 hybrid’s full 245 hp and 354 lb-ft of torque are available.




The A6 hybrid is distinguished from normal A6s by unique 17- and 18-inch wheels, plus “hybrid” badging on the decklid, fenders, and door sills. A U.S.-market A6 hybrid isn’t likely to deviate much—if at all—from the Euro car’s formula, but we’ll have to wait for Audi to send it here to find out.





Tags: Audi, Audi A6, Audi A6 hybrid |



2010 Subaru Legacy 3.6R Limited Long-Term Wrap: A Lasting Legacy is Doubtful

Our Legacy danced when we wanted it to, but shimmied even when we didn’t. After our 2010 Subaru Legacy 3.6R spent 40,000 miles in our care, Subaru chose not to leave the car with us. This is, of course, always the case: Manufacturers whisk their cars away to poke, prod, and otherwise debrief them on [...]

2012 Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG Coupe Black Series: More Power, Raging Looks




BY JARED GALL, PHOTOGRAPHY BY ANDREAS LINDLAHR AND THE MANUFACTURER
July 2011



The latest in a very short but highly distinguished—and completely nuts—line of Black Series Benzes is here. The C63 AMG Black Series is based on the C63 coupe, which we just drove for the first time a few months ago. Following the lead of the not-for-U.S.-sale SLK55 Black Series, the CLK63 Black Series, and the SL65 Black Series, this C63 AMG is amped up visually and dynamically, with a steroidal bump in output to back up the flared nostrils.


In case the 451 hp and 443 lb-ft in the standard-issue C63 AMG or the 481 and 443 offered by that car’s AMG Development Package aren’t quite cutting it, the C63 AMG BS makes 510 hp at 6800 rpm and 457 lb-ft at 5200. Like cars with the Development Pack, the Black Series borrows its pistons, connecting rods, and crankshaft from the be-gullwinged SLS AMG supercar. Behind the motor lives the same seven-speed automatic found in the regular C63, packing four shift modes and a launch-control function for when you really don’t want to linger at this stupid party one more split second. We ran a Development Pack sedan to 60 mph in just 3.9 seconds; with wider rear rubber, figure on the Black Series shaving a couple tenths from that and clearing the quarter-mile in around 12 seconds flat.


I’m Going to Eat You


Like the Black Series cars that came before it, the C63 oozes menace and purpose. Air can’t flow through stuff, so there’s remarkably little material remaining in the front fascia, the bumper that once resided there largely displaced by intakes covered by black mesh. A gaping central intake is flanked by two smaller holes through which cooling air enters, and two nostrils atop the hood give hot air a convenient exit from underhood. As if to emphasize its name and purpose, the front splitter comes to a sharp point in the middle of the nose.


Flared fenders widen the car by 2.2 inches up front and 3.3 out back, covering tracks stretched by 1.6 and 3.1 inches, respectively. Vents behind the front wheels and ahead of the rears are both nonfunctional, which somewhat diminishes their awesomeness. The lightweight wheels at each corner have their movements controlled by adjustable coil-overs, while speed-sensitive steering issues directional orders and Black Series–specific anti-roll bars maintain the contact patches during aggressive driving. The brake rotors measure 15.4 inches in diameter up front and 14.2 inches out back. Red paint is standard on the calipers, which have six pistons up front and four in the rear. The rubber measures 255/35-19 up front and 285/30-19 out back—that’s up from 235/40-18s and 255/35-18s on the basic C63 AMG coupe—and a limited-slip diff is standard, as is a stability-control system that will get entirely out of the way if you want it to.


Flat Bottom Girls


You’ll notice hard-shell sport buckets in the accompanying photos, but those aren’t likely to make it to the U.S. We are likely, however, to at least get red stitching on whatever seats we do end up with. Calm down. The rear seat has been dismissed in the interest of weight savings, but can be reactivated if you’d like to frighten more than just one person at a time. And AMG has flattened both the bottom and top of the steering wheel, which makes it way more serious than all those wheels with just flat bottoms. Lest the screaming V-8 deafen your passenger to the point they can no longer hear the V-8 screaming, a Black Series logo on the dash will remind them why they can’t hear.


Those who feel the flared and vented look of the C63 AMG Black Series isn’t quite enough will be able to crank up the appearance even more with an AMG Aerodynamics package that includes carbon-fiber winglets on the front valance and a fixed carbon-fiber spoiler with an adjustable aerofoil. AMG says these bits are functional and increase downforce, but isn’t saying by how much. It also won’t provide photos of a car so equipped, so we don’t know by how much they make it look more menacing and/or ridiculous. The C63 Black’s other major option package is a Track pack that includes even higher-performance rubber of unspecified Dunlop pedigree, as well as a differential cooler.


All Black Series cars to this point have been low-production affairs, the SLK55 AMG, for example, being limited to just 120 units. The CLK63 and SL65 sold in slightly higher numbers, at 700 and 350, respectively. While Mercedes isn’t saying yet how many C63 AMG Black Series it will build, representatives do tell us the number will be capped. Figure on a sticker edging close to $100,000. While that’s awfully steep for a car that shares its basic shape and structure with a coupe starting in the mid-$30,000 range, it is about $40,000 cheaper than the CLK63 Black Series and a whopping $200K less than the SL65 Black Series. So if you’ve got a spot reserved in your garage for what will certainly be the cheapest U.S.-market Black Series car yet, get on the horn to your dealer now. U.S. distribution will begin early in 2012.



 

2012 Lexus GS350 / GS F-Sport Prototype Drive: For Real, It’s a Sporty GS


The GS is Lexus’s answer to the BMW 5-series and the Mercedes-Benz E-class, but it has never quite measured up to those two sedans in sales numbers. As the car enters its fourth generation, Lexus tells us the GS will be sportier and more focused on the driving experience.


That goes for the company, too. Content with more than 20 years of pursuing perfection, it will use the upcoming GS to lead a philosophical change, an outlook it describes as “joy and leading edge.” We’re told that means that the brand is moving beyond the Spock-like purely rational and toward emotional connections with buyers. Driver enjoyment and engagement are vital to the new attitude. Aggression is in. Complete isolation is out. We’ve seen inklings of the shift in cars like the IS-F and the LFA supercar, but the new GS is a volume product, not a limited-edition model. To give us a taste of its new way of thinking, Lexus invited us to drive two heavily camouflaged GS350 prototypes.


I Believe We’ve Met


Powering both prototypes is a warmed-over version of the GS350’s current 3.5-liter V-6. Lexus staffers wouldn’t get too specific about the changes to the engine, but hinted at the possibility of a few more horsepower. We’ve never straight-line tested a GS350, but we have no reason to doubt Lexus’s 0-to-60-mph estimate of 5.7 seconds. For those seeking more acceleration—as well as fuel-conscious buyers—the GS hybrid will return. Running contrary to Lexus’s claims about newfound sportiness, the V-8–powered GS460 is dead.


Even with the cars covered in what look like garbage bags, it’s easy to tell that this new GS is a break from those that have come before. From what we could see, the dashboard and doors are wrapped in leather in a style that mimics the LFA’s interior. The Lexus “waterfall” center console is gone. In its place is a massive 12.3-inch screen that displays navigation and audio information, as well as a host of other vehicle settings. Models without navigation will get a smaller screen. Sit down in the current GS, and it immediately feels stodgy and dated.


Our drive included two different GS models. One represented the mainstream GS350 while the other shows just how far the GS350 might take driver involvement. Standard on all upcoming GS sedans will be Lexus Drive Mode Select. The Drive Mode Select knob allows the driver to put the car in Eco, Normal, Sport S, or Sport S+ modes. Eco dials back throttle response and upshifts the six-speed automatic transmission early to boost fuel economy. Switch to Sport, and the transmission holds gears longer, downshifts under aggressive braking, and increases throttle sensitivity. Move the shifter into the manual gate and downshift with either the shifter or the paddles, and the engine blips itself for rev-matched downshifts. Sport+ is only available on cars equipped with active shocks (as our two prototypes were). This setting stiffens the shocks, as well as quickens the steering on models fitted with the variable-ratio system.


F That


The sportier of the two prototypes available for our drive will be known as the GS F-Sport when it goes on sale in early 2012. Higher spring rates, a thicker anti-roll bar, firmer adaptive shocks, larger two-piece front brake rotors, four-wheel steering, a variable-ratio rack, and 19-inch wheels with summer tires (235/40-19 in front and 265/35-19 in back) give the F-Sport quick responses and plenty of grip. The chassis can easily handle more power than the 3.5-liter V-6 can deliver. Switch to Sport +, and the steering becomes quick (we measured 2.2 turns lock-to-lock) and the weighting increases. Accurate and spirited, the quick steering makes the GS feel like a smaller car. One gripe: The steering effort doesn’t increase in response to front-tire stress. Switch the stability control completely off, and the F-Sport proves playful. It’s possible to coax the GS to power oversteer, but the big sticky rubber in back and the four-wheel steering brings the rear end back in line with ease.


Riding on 18-inch wheels with 235/45-18 summer tires, the second prototype on hand proved to be a less-extreme machine. Compared to the F-Sport, the mainstream GS is softer and has more body roll. After driving the F-Sport equipped with variable steering, the non-variable rack-and-pinion feels slower. Then we drove the current GS and found it to be even less secure feeling, with a very intrusive stability-control system.


Say No to Growing Pains

The new GS will not be any larger than the current car. Wheelbase is unchanged at 112.2 inches, while overall length increases from 190 inches to 190.9. Interior space is up, thanks to a 0.8-inch increase in width and a roof that’s higher by 1.2 inches. The latter provides a boost to rear-seat headroom. Through the use of high-strength steel and more laser welding, Lexus claims its new platform is both more rigid and lighter than before. Unfortunately, any weight loss there will be cancelled out by more standard and optional equipment, and the GS’s curb weight will remain roughly where it is today.

Lexus will debut the GS on August 18. After that, the GS hybrid will turn up at the Frankfurt auto show in September, a few weeks before the GS F-Sport breaks cover at the SEMA show in Las Vegas. Lexus wouldn’t reveal the exact on-sale date, but we were told it would be sometime in early 2012. Snow sufferers should see an all-wheel-drive GS350 by the middle of next year.


Having driven only prototypes, it’s a bit too early to determine how the GS will stack up against the competition, but a legitimate sports sedan from Lexus may give BMW and Audi buyers something to consider.



Specifications


VEHICLE TYPE: front-engine, rear and 4-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, 4-door sedan


ESTIMATED BASE PRICE: GS350, $48,000; GS hybrid, $55,000; GS F-Sport, $55,000


ENGINE TYPE: DOHC 24-valve V-6, aluminum block and heads, direct fuel injection


Displacement: 211 cu in, 3456 cc
Power (SAE net): 305 hp @ 6200 rpm
Torque (SAE net): 274 lb-ft @ 3600 rpm


TRANSMISSION: 6-speed automatic with manual shifting mode


DIMENSIONS:
Wheelbase: 112.2 in Length: 190.9 in
Width: 72.4 in Height: 57.3 in
Curb weight (C/D EST): 3850 lb


PERFORMANCE (C/D EST):
Zero to 60 mph: 5.7 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 14.2 sec
Top speed: 145 mph


FUEL ECONOMY (C/D EST):
EPA city/highway: 20/27 mpg



 

Here Comes the Chug: Chevrolet Confirms Diesel Cruze for 2013



July 22, 2011 at 10:40am by Justin Berkowitz

2011 Chevrolet Cruze


Chevrolet has just announced that some time in 2013, it will launch a diesel-powered version of the Cruze in the U.S. The car will use a variant of the 2.0-liter four that’s installed in Cruzes throughout the world, but the company is otherwise silent on details, providing no further information on pricing, fuel economy, or output ratings.


Some markets receive a diesel Cruze with 163 hp and 265 lb-ft of torque, while others get a version with 148 hp and 236 lb-ft. Our bet would be for us to receive the latter—this is a small car, after all, and Chevy’s play here is to pump up its fuel-economy numbers. Whether the diesel-fueled Cruze will roundly trump other the small cars clustered around 40 mpg—including the Hyundai Elantra and Chevy’s own 42-mpg Cruze Eco, which the company assures us will still be sold when the diesel arrives—is up to the EPA. Considering that Chevrolet offers a six-speed manual transmission in all of the gasoline-powered Cruze models sold here already, we would expect that a row-your-own gearbox will be on offer for this new model, as well.


While we’d love to be able to run down a full spec sheet on the future diesel Cruze, the bare-bones info—a torquey diesel and a likely stick—is certainly enough to satiate us for today. Now, about that hatchback version of the Cruze . . .




Tags: Chevrolet, Chevrolet Cruze, diesel, engines |



Italian Carabinieri Sign Two Evoras Up for High-Speed Emergency Duty



July 21, 2011 at 1:24pm by Alexander Stoklosa


The Italian Carabinieri (military police) have enlisted two specially prepared Lotus Evora S sports cars for organ and blood transport duty. These aren’t the first high-performance, mid-engine sports cars Italian authorities have slapped a light bar on: The Polizia famously recruited a few Lamborghini Gallardos for the same task—and infamously crashed one of them. Perhaps that’s why the Carabinieri had to turn to a British carmaker.


The transformation from pedestrian Evora S to four-wheeled life-or-death transport car begins with a dark-blue and white Carabinieri paint job, over which fang-like pointy red graphics are applied. Of course, one needs more than an aggressive livery to get other motorists out of the way when barreling down the autostrada to deliver vital organs in a timely manner, so the Evora sports a roof-mounted light bar as well as lights added to the grille and dashboard. To ensure blood and organs reach their destination safe to eat—er—stitch in, the Carabinieri installed a refrigerated compartment behind the front seats to keep the meat cold. It’s not like they were going to fit perps back there.


The two Carabinieri Evoras will be stationed in Milan and Rome and serve two-year tours. So if you ever need an organ or an emergency blood transfusion and the closest replacement is a far-but-drivable-distance away, you might want to hope your major health event happens somewhere in Italy.





Tags: Lotus, Lotus Evora, Lotus Evora S |



Wednesday, July 27, 2011

Ford Transit Connect Approved for Taxi Use in NYC



July 21, 2011 at 2:55pm by Alexander Stoklosa


In a hearing today, the New York Taxi and Limousine Commission approved the Ford Transit Connect for taxi service in the city. You’re probably thinking “wait a tick, didn’t the City of New York recently hold a competition among manufacturers to determine ‘NYC’s Taxi of Tomorrow,’ and didn’t Ford’s Transit Connect lose that competition to Nissan’s NV200 small van?” The answer to both of your questions is yes.


But the Transit Connect did not completely lose the chance to ferry New Yorkers about, because Nissan’s exclusive 10-year contract doesn’t kick in until 2013. In the meantime, Ford is free to foist its small, high-roof van upon the taxi companies of New York. Ford also won approval for its Taurus sedan at the Taxi Commission’s hearing; while certainly no Crown Victoria, the Taurus is at least a large sedan, which is sure to make it popular among the big-sedan-philic hired car set.




Tags: Ford, Ford Transit Connect, New York City, NYC, taxi |



2013 Chevrolet Colorado SUV Spy Photos: Wanna Bet They Don’t Call It TrailBlazer?





With the new small Chevy Colorado pickup likely to come stateside, a fraternal SUV has now joined the fray.


BY STUART FOWLE, PHOTOGRAPHY BY KGP PHOTOGRAPHY AND THE MANUFACTURER
July 2011






2013 Chevrolet Colorado SUV Spy Photos







The Chevrolet Colorado has stirred up more buzz than any mid-size pickup has in a very long time—a little surprising, since it hasn’t officially been confirmed for sale in the United States. Is it just another case of us wanting what we can’t have? Perhaps, and Chevrolet seems to want it that way. While some quotes from the division the past few months indicate the global Colorado will indeed be built and sold in America within the next two years, the company’s communications staff continues to give us the cold shoulder when asked for outright confirmation.


Interest has again spiked, because, as you can see in these spy photos, there’s going to be an SUV version. As you’ll remember, Chevrolet stopped producing truck-based mid-size SUVs here with the death of the TrailBlazer; the unibody Equinox and Traverse now represent the bowtie in their respective classes. There is recent precedent for a small-pickup-based GM SUV, however, in the form of the Hummer H3, which used the current Colorado as its base. If the new pickup is in fact headed here (and we think it should be), Chevrolet just might see a market for truck-based sport-utes as well. Nissan serves as an example of car- and truck-based utes living in harmony, with the Murano, the Pathfinder, and the Xterra being sold side-by-side for some time now.


Both the Colorado pickup and SUV are still heavily camouflaged in these spy photos, but imagining how they’ll look isn’t hard. The open-bed version should look nearly identical to the concept shown back in March. Now, remember back to when the Chevy S-10 and the Blazer were both on sale and it’s easy to picture the SUV, even if that tall, boxy camo is throwing off the proportions. If or when Chevrolet launches it here, we expect it’ll be spun as an active-lifestyle alternative to the city dweller’s Equinox.


As far as engine choices go, it’s easiest to imagine a U.S.-spec Colorado getting the corporate 3.6-liter V-6 because, well, every mid-size anything under the GM umbrella makes use of that engine. The Equinox’s naturally aspirated 2.4-liter inline-four is another option, although we’d love to see both a turbo four and a small turbo-diesel (as was installed in a second Colorado truck concept) used to make smaller pickup trucks and any resulting SUVs relevant again. Hopefully, more details will come soon, but we have plenty of time to continue speculating—don’t expect either of these vehicles to show up before 2013.



 







Name That Shifter, No. 33: 2000 Honda Insight



July 20, 2011 at 1:45pm by Car and Driver



Click to enlarge



On Monday we presented this week’s shifter and asked you to identify the make and model of the vehicle from whence it came. The presence of the 1990s Honda shift knob helped several of you recognize the car as a 2000 Honda Insight. The first commenter to correctly identify it was DEM, who specified both the year and the model and will receive a Save the Manuals button and sticker as a reward.


The Insight pictured here is from our January 2000 issue. At the Insight’s press launch, Honda set up a fuel-economy contest among automotive magazines that would vie for top mpg honors during a run from Columbus, Ohio, to Detroit. We handily won this competition with the, erm, creative use of a Ford Excursion modified to serve as a rolling wind break. The photo of the front of the Insight below was taken from the cargo area of the Excursion. Our trip mileage? We squeezed 121.7 mpg out of the tiny hybrid at an average speed of 58 mph.





Tags: Honda Insight, Name That Shifter, Save the Manuals! |



BMW 335i Performance Edition Package Will Be Available to 135i Owners



July 20, 2011 at 3:16pm by Alexander Stoklosa


Just a couple weeks ago, BMW announced that it will offer a $550 Performance Edition package on single-turbo (N55 engine) 335i coupes and sedans; better still, existing 335i owners could retrofit the package to their cars. In a press release today, however, we discovered a small addition BMW snuck in: owners of the 135i with the N55 also can have the dealer-installed package added to their rides.


The 335i Performance Edition package is a massive bargain and includes such goodies as special badging, black grilles and grille surrounds, and an output increase of 20 hp, for a total of 320. Torque increases to 332 lb-ft on cars with an automatic transmission and 317 lb-ft for those with a stick. BMW hasn’t announced pricing for the retrofit package yet—it will do so in August—but we can’t imagine it will be much more than the $550 it takes to bolt this kit to a new Bimmer. We have clocked a stock 300-hp 135i to 60 mph in just 4.8 seconds, and we look forward to seeing what sort of whittling another 20 hp could do to that time.




Tags: BMW, BMW 1-series, BMW 135i |



A Quick Trip Up North to the Bridgestone Racing Academy



Put a bunch of people in identically prepared cars, stick a seasoned instructor in front of them, and point them toward a race track—boom!—instant racing school. It’s a relatively simple formula, one we’ve experienced in Miatas, through forests, and at the wheel of fully prepped rally cars. Formulaic could also describe accredited engineering colleges, but that doesn’t mean they’re all the same—in both cases it’s the quality of instruction, the facilities, and the curriculum (not to mention the heftiness of loans required for enrollment) that differentiate them. Having completed one, we probably wouldn’t jump at the chance to try out another exciting engineering program, but another driver-training school? Just tell us when and where.


The when was last week. The school in question is the Bridgestone Racing Academy, which uses Mosport International Raceway outside of Toronto as its base of operations. The students were mostly Canadian journalists with a couple of Americans tossed in the mix—we were outnumbered eight to two, and they had the home-country advantage. But this wasn’t a competition, despite the lap times printed and passed around on day two, and the word “racing” right there in the school’s name. Fortunately, the cars help even things out.



About those cars: The academy has a fleet of relatively new Van Diemen Formula cars. They weigh about 1000 pounds and are powered by a 170-hp, 2.3-liter Mazda four-cylinder. The terribly un-sexy one-lug wheels are wrapped in—you guessed it—Bridgestone tires. The school uses RE-11 performance street tires as a learning tool—progressive loss of grip is easier to anticipate and correct. Plus, Bridgestone wouldn’t be too mad if students left the class with the urge to buy a new set of similar rubber for their cars.



We were there for a two-day session modeled after the Learn to Lap course, which runs $2495 Canadian. Day one starts off with a chalk talk (or whatever the modern white-board equivalent is) in the classroom. After being fitted for protective gear, all of which is provided, we headed out to the cars for a walkaround. The first exercise was designed to get us used to the transmission, which is a sequential five-speed manual with neutral locked out. Prepare for a left-leg workout. We practiced braking with downshifting and began to get settled in the car. Next up was a lead/follow exercise to begin learning the line around the track. The afternoon was spent doing what we’ll call follow/lead laps—after trailing an instructor we were waved by to lap at our own pace and received feedback afterward. Straightforward stuff, but necessary when hopping into an unfamiliar car on an unfamiliar track.


The real fun came on day two. Despite soreness resulting from day one, we were all getting comfortable with the cars and their quirks, and also starting to learn what to do where. A track walk in the morning helped solidify things. This would have been too much to process on day one, and the instructors were good about limiting the number of things you have to think about at any given time; cone gates show turn-in points, braking zones are marked, and each round of practice had instructors giving feedback about one part of the track instead of forcing us to process our mistakes for every turn at once. Timing sheets for each of day two’s five lapping sessions provided proof of improvement. Some people spun testing the limits. Everyone had a good time.



Some advantages of the academy over similar schools: The track was purpose-built for training and provides a good variety of learning opportunities with very few truly dangerous spots (they call this low risk). And it’s reconfigurable, allowing the instructors to match the complexity to building skill level. The academy is the only one in North America to teach race starts and passing, and it seems to work; graduates include James Hinchcliffe, who was on hand fresh from the Toronto IndyCar race to provide some expert instruction on day two. His exhibition lap just before the graduation ceremony showed everyone what the cars could really do.


We didn’t quite get to his level in two days, but everyone did get better. It’s cheaper than engineering school, a lot more fun, and something we’d be pleased to repeat.



Tuesday, July 26, 2011

2012 Scion iQ First Drive: Continuously Clever to a Fault




BY JOHN PEARLEY HUFFMAN
July 2011



Here’s what the new Scion iQ has going for it: It’s tiny outside, but not so small inside. Four people can wedge in when necessary. It’s good-looking, the interior design is about the best of any cheap car, and the seats are comfortable. The suspension is simple, but it works well, and the precise steering and its size make the iQ super easy to park. And although the front-mounted 1.3-liter engine makes 94 hp, the iQ weighs just a cheerleader more than a ton.


Here’s what’s wrong with the new Scion iQ: It’s stuck with a continuously variable transmission that drains the fun out of it. Every. Single. Drop.


The Price Is Certainly “Premium”


Toyota—okay, Scion—describes the iQ as a “premium micro-subcompact” and will sell it as such when it goes on sale in October as a $15,995 single-spec model backed by a dealer-installed accessory catalog. That’s a ton of cash when you consider the plethora of larger and more practical cars available for less money, among them the Honda Fit, Ford Fiesta, Hyundai Accent, and Kia Soul. But, hey, at least the iQ costs less than the mechanically identical Aston Martin Cygnet.


The Scion does, however, look substantial and well detailed for a dink-class runabout. The bumper covers are painted and fit tightly, the headlights are complex units, there are turn-signal lights integrated into the bottom of the side mirrors, and the 175/60-16 tires fill out the wheel wells. Even the wheel covers on the steel wheels almost plausibly pass for metal. Besides its length—120.1 inches, 14.0 longer than a Smart Fortwo but a substantial 26.5 shorter than a Mini Cooper—and 78.7-inch wheelbase, little about the iQ screams “cheap.”


Inside, the driver faces a thick, flat-bottomed, three-spoke steering wheel covered in red-stitched leather and an instrument panel that nestles the tach in the lower right quadrant of the speedometer. And there’s an information screen to the left of those. It’s a compact, logical, and legible arrangement.


The center stack has three simple knobs for controlling the HVAC system and is capped by a pod that contains a double-DIN-size Pioneer audio head unit. If a buyer doesn’t like the standard stereo, Scion will have a dealer-swappable upgraded Pioneer unit and a navigation system available.


The thin-shelled, fabric-covered front seats sort of bend around any awkward body shape. The passenger-side front-seat rails are mounted slightly forward of the driver’s, and the dashboard on that side is slightly forward, too. The arrangement affords a bit more legroom for right-side passengers. A flotsam tray under the passenger seat is particularly useful if that seat’s occupant is a drooler.


Even with the passenger seat thrown forward for ingress, it’s a chore to get to the rear seat. It’s not roomy back there, but that there’s any space at all is a miracle of packaging efficiency and owes something to the engine placement. So the kids feel claustrophobic looking through the pie-slice rear windows? At least there’s an innovative rear-window airbag to protect their heads in a collision.


Damn, Dirty CVT


The 1.3-liter four has a 16-valve DOHC head, variable valve timing, and an aggressive 11.5:1 compression ratio, but it doesn’t have much sporting character and has to be wrung to its 6000-rpm redline to whip up the full 94 horses. The modest 89 lb-ft of torque is available a bit lower peak, at 4400 rpm.


But those pattering pound-feet travel through that cursed CVT. Other markets in which the iQ is sold as a Toyota—or as the shameful Cygnet—are blessed with a manual transmission, but here in North America there’s no choice. So jam a brick on the accelerator, and the iQ’s little engine runs to about four grand and sticks there as the car slowly engineers forward progress with a drone.


Every time the iQ is about to do something entertaining, the CVT intrudes and spoils it. Dive into a corner, the tires bite and…the transmission induces its drone of defeat and the car practically falls on its nose. Scion says the iQ will run from 0 to 60 mph in 11.8 seconds, but a better estimate might be a week.


Scions always seem to promise more fun than they deliver. (We hope the upcoming FR-S–based coupe will prove different.) But tune the iQ’s front struts and rear torsion beam a bit, bolt on some righteous rubber, tweak the engine to about 130 hp, give it a decent transmission, and this car could be a point-and-squirt legend.


Right now, it’s only frustratingly clever.



Specifications


VEHICLE TYPE: front-engine, front-wheel-drive, 4-passenger, 3-door hatchback


BASE PRICE: $15,995


ENGINE TYPE: DOHC 16-valve inline-4, aluminum block and head, direct fuel injection


Displacement: 81 cu in, 1329 cc
Power (SAE net): 94 hp @ 6000 rpm
Torque (SAE net): 89 lb-ft @ 4400 rpm


TRANSMISSION: continuously variable automatic


DIMENSIONS:
Wheelbase: 78.7 in Length: 120.1 in
Width: 66.1 in Height: 59.1 in
Curb weight (C/D est): 2150 lb


PERFORMANCE (MFR’S EST):
Zero to 60 mph: 11.8 sec
Top speed: 100 mph


FUEL ECONOMY (MFR’S EST):
EPA city/highway: 36/37 mpg



 


 


 

69 Camaro Red Devil Tested: 756 HP, 804 LB-FT, 4.1 to 60!



We’re visiting an odd spot in the universe where level-headed civility doesn’t pertain. This is a dream destination where the unlikely is the norm and the preposterous is the rule. Here, the ride of choice is a vintage Chevy Camaro packing Corvette ZR1 speed and handling.


True believers call this sect of the car faith Pro Touring (PT). On the sacred tree of motoring, the PT branch thrives several limbs up from hot rods and a couple over from restomods. The essential ingredients are outrageous power, 1.0-g cornering and braking capabilities, and stock sheetmetal. The “Red Devil” Camaro constructed by GM engineer Mark Stielow [see below] is a PT track star masquerading as a street-legal F-body.


In case your subscription to Car Craft has expired: The ’69 Camaro is now and forever the most cherished muscle car ever made. This model year’s combination of classic beauty, tidy size, and ample underhood space makes it a favorite starting point for tuners and collectors. GM vice-president of global design Ed Welburn not only owns one, he all but cloned the ’69 Camaro to renew Chevy’s fight with the immortal Ford Mustang.


The Red Devil is No. 11 in a series of  ’69 Camaros massaged by Stielow over the past 23 years. To the casual observer, it’s a survivor that rolled off a GM assembly line the year mankind made its giant leap to the moon. But don’t be fooled: This Camaro packs double the ammo provided by the General back in the day, along with the chassis fortifications needed to taunt the bluebloods from Stuttgart and Maranello.


original

Proving that he’s seriously hooked on speed, Stielow loaded the Devil’s engine bay with a sinful combination of LS7, LS9, and aftermarket power parts. His 7.0-liter Corvette Z06  block is topped with a ZR1’s cylinder heads, valvetrain, and supercharger. Inside, the best catalog parts money can buy are force-fed 12 psi of  boost by an Eaton TVS supercharger spinning 30 percent faster than stock.  A Tremec six-speed transmission sends an estimated 756 horsepower back to a 3.25:1, nine-inch solid axle fitted with a True­trac limited-slip differential and located by a Detroit Speed suspension system. That same vendor also supplied the hydroformed subframe, the front suspension, rack-and-pinion steering  gear, and coil-over dampers fitted at all four corners.


The surprise is how calmly the Red Devil behaves. The engine fires instantly and settles into a polite 750-rpm idle, temporarily suppressing its wild side. The clutch is light, progressive in its takeup, and easy to sync with the throttle for a composed creepaway. The pedals are ideally positioned for heel-and-toe footwork, and Stielow’s shifter knows the quick way  through the fortified T-56 gearbox.


To dial in the steering to his liking, Stielow trial-fitted three rack-and-pinion units before settling on one with low friction and decent feedback. A similar procedure was used for tires. Testing on a Michigan race circuit, he trimmed precious seconds of  lap time moving from ­BFGoodrich to Michelin radials before installing the final set of Goodyear Eagle F1 Supercar G:2 rubber. These 18- and 19-inch run-flats team the standard Corvette Z06 sizes with next-generation construction.


Chilly test conditions kept the Goodyears from delivering their last increments of performance. On our 300-foot skidpad, the Red Devil cornered at a still impressive 0.98 g with minimal body roll and just a touch of understeer. With slight additional throttle pressure, we could easily coax this Camaro’s tail into a stable neutral drift. The securely located rear axle and the effort Stielow invested tuning his dampers, anti-roll bars, and steering system have trained an arthritic Camaro into an agile cornering champion. A few hot laps around the road course and through our slalom cones confirmed that impression. The Red Devil turns in obediently, confidently grabs the cornering line, and exits bends with the steering straight and the rear tires alight.


To achieve modern stopping perform­ance, Stielow added a Corvette Z06 anti-lock system to the Brembo drilled rotors and calipers he fitted to the Red Devil. In spite of a slightly spongy pedal (attributable to imperfect bleeding, says Stielow), we measured consistent, 171-foot 70-to-0-mph stopping distances with no hint of wriggle or fade.


Launching any 756-hp missile without electronic assistance is not for sissies. In spite of the cold pavement and a restricted number of runs, we recorded acceleration figures within sniffing distance of a Corvette ZR1’s: 0 to 60 in 4.1 seconds (versus 3.4), the quarter-mile in 11.8 seconds at 127 mph (compared with 11.5 at 128). For a home-built riding on narrower tires and weighing an additional 267 pounds, that’s impressive. And we’re convinced there’s more to be had, but we terminated acceleration and top-speed tests when an overworked supercharger pulley  failed, consuming the engine’s serpentine belt. Another interesting comparator is the ’69 Camaro ZL-1 we tested several years ago [December 1997]: That rubber-challenged survivor clocked 0 to 60 in 5.2 seconds and the quarter in 13.8 seconds at 105 mph.


When the Red Devil’s throttle is down, the din inside rattles wax from your ears. Spectators a quarter-mile away scatter, fearing that a berserk locomotive is heading their way. Yet this Camaro knows how to behave. It has comfortable Recaro bucket seats, informative instruments, effective climate control, and a reasonably relaxed ride. The three-inch exhaust pipes don’t hiss, rattle, or roar until they’re asked to do so. Overall, the Red Devil drives like a refugee from the GM proving grounds.


For the most part, Pro Touring is a credit-card and catalog exercise. You start with a clean core, choose your parts and subcontractors wisely, and exercise patience constructing the car of your dreams. If you’re lucky, you end up with a car half as good as Stielow’s.


In this instance, that old saw about the devil and the details actually fits. With a dozen Camaros to his credit, Stielow has perfected his craft. His underhood presentation is a van Gogh in matte black, red, and zinc plating. To prepare the ZR1 intercooler lid for its new life, he milled off the factory “6.2L” label to install new “7.0L” lettering. The engine shroud that originally boasted “CORVETTE” now reads “CHEVROLET.” When Stielow advances the Pro Touring cause with his next hero car, count us in for another go.








The Red Devil’s cockpit is furnished with Recaro seats, Sparco belts, a Momo steering wheel, Auto Meter instruments, and Vintage Air climate control. Stielow fabricated the roll bar and instrument panel.



By day, he fine-tunes future suspension systems as GM’s vehicle-dynamics authority. At night, he constructs the sweetest ’69 Camaros big money can buy. Mark Stielow, Pro Touring’s 46-year-old pope, coined the movement’s name and co-wrote its bible with how-to author Will Handzel (Pro Touring Engineered Performance, $26.95, www.sdparts.com).


Stielow’s path to hot-rodding fame started in the garage of his father’s Kansas City garbage-hauling business. While he was a mechanical-engineering student at the University of Missouri, Stielow captained the school’s Formula SAE team, which he parlayed into a job tracking Camaros racing in the SCCA’s Showroom Stock series.


After receiving his engineering degree in 1991, Stielow joined GM as a Chevy Caprice development engineer. He graduated to GM’s motorsports technology department before becoming Summit Racing’s chief product-development engineer in 1995.


Stielow returned to GM in 1999 to design and develop . . . door handles. In 2000, he was mercifully promoted to a ride-and-handling development job at GM’s Milford proving grounds where he collaborated with the legendary John Heinricy on the development of the company’s SS and V-series models. In his spare time, Stielow built “Mule,” his eighth ’69 Camaro, with which Popular Hot Rodding mesmerized its readers in 22 how-to installments. It was Mule more than any other single car that set the mold—and the bar awfully high—for the burgeoning Pro Touring world. Mule also visited GM’s design studio during development of the current ’69-inspired Camaro.


Building the Red Devil put a six-figure dent in Stielow’s savings and consumed 24 months of his evenings and weekends, time and money he considers well spent. “This is my ultimate hot rod, the best Camaro I’ve built to date,” he notes. “It’s fast, it handles well, and it’s a comfortable cruiser.”


Stielow has no intention of selling Red Devil. If you want a clone, he’ll refer you to his allies Kyle and Stacy Tucker at Detroit Speed. Their estimated cost? $250,000.


Too pricey? Eventually, you’ll be able to race a digitized version of the Red Devil in a future Gran Turismo video game.




Specifications


VEHICLE TYPE: front-engine, rear-wheel-drive, 2-passenger, 2-door coupe


ESTIMATED BASE PRICE: $250,000


ENGINE TYPE: supercharged and intercooled pushrod 16-valve V-8, aluminum block and heads, port fuel injection


Displacement: 428 cu in, 7008 cc
Power (SAE net): 756 hp @ 6600 rpm
Torque (SAE net): 804 lb-ft @ 3900 rpm


TRANSMISSION: 6-speed manual


DIMENSIONS:
Wheelbase: 108.0 in Length: 186.0 in
Width: 72.3 in Height: 51.0 in
Curb weight: 3617 lb


C/D TEST RESULTS:
Zero to 60 mph: 4.1 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 7.8 sec
Zero to 140 mph: 14.1 sec
Street start, 5–60 mph: 4.2 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 11.8 sec @ 127 mph
Top speed (mfr's estimate, drag limited): 193 mph
Braking, 70–0 mph: 171 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.98 g


TEST NOTES: First gear tops out barely above 60 mph; an early shift adds 0.2 second there. It takes practice to manage wheelspin for a perfect launch. Unfortunately, our best run was our last. We hit 60 in less than four seconds right before the supercharger drive pulley broke.